Story : James Goyder
..............................................................................................................

The International Monetary Fund (IMF), the international organization that oversees the global financial system, recently announced its prediction that the world economy will grow much more slowly in the next two years as a result of the so called ‘credit crunch’.
It predicts that world economic growth will slow to 3.7% in 2008 and 2009, 1.25% lower than growth in 2007, and goes as far as to suggest that there is a one in four chance of a global recession.
But what will be the impact on Thailand and the rest of South East Asia? According to many experts, while South East Asian economies are by no means immune from what has become a global epidemic they may remain surprisingly resilient.
The United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (UNESCAP) recently launched the latest issue of its flagship publication, the Economic and Social Survey of Asia and the Pacific 2008, in which it acknowledges that, ‘The Asia-Pacific region has entered a “phase of heightened uncertainty” amid financial turmoil due to fall-out from the sub-prime credit crisis, the threat from rising inflation and a major slowdown in the United States economy.’
The survey warns that, ‘A sharp downturn in the US would also hit exports from Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines and Malaysia.’ However there is good news with the survey suggesting that the Asia-Pacific region’s strong macro-economic fundamentals and underlying regional domestic demand will act as a vital buffer to any significant United States downturn.

Meanwhile the Investor’s Business Daily reported that, ‘The Asian Development Bank (ADB) lowered its economic growth forecasts for the region. Though Asian economies grew 8.7% in 2007 — the fastest rate in 20 years — the region is expected to grow just 7.6% this year. Across the region, greater demand and higher transport costs have pushed up the prices of crude oil and food staples such as rice, wheat and palm oil.’ According to the same publication, ‘We are in for a period of moderation of growth in the Asian economies, but I don’t think the full scale has been felt yet.’
Sharing this more pessimistic outlook, in his own inimitable style, is Richard Daughty of the Asia Times. He claims that, ‘If you thought inflation is bad now, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet, because the sheer tonnage of money necessary to pay off everybody’s debts here at the end of a long economic boom caused by, as usual, the creation of excess money and credit by the banks over a long period of time with lax governmental supervision is so huge that it probably totals over a quadrillion dollars.’

Daughty does not believe there is any obvious answer to the problem: ‘I have always staunchly maintained that there always comes a time when NOTHING can be done, and that the only thing that should be done is to prevent the problem by keeping the damned money supply and debt levels constant, as when they are constrained by gold, so that you don’t end up in this damned situation in the first damned place.’
In Thailand The Nation predicted that Asian economies would remain resilient despite the credit crunch, pointing out that, ‘The Asia Pacific saw remarkable growth in both the first half and the second half of last year. Despite the downturn in some major real estate markets and the weakening US dollar, capital continued to pour into the region in the second half of the year.’
The Bangkok Post also felt that the consequences of the credit crunch would be felt in the real estate market warning that, ‘Global direct real-estate investment is expected to drop by at least 30% from the record level of US$759 billion last year due to the decline in American and European markets.’ According to the Post, ‘The situation is being exacerbated by unease about the global economy, in particular about major economies such as the US, the United Kingdom and Japan.’
It issued a cautionary note to the local banking sector recommending that, ‘Thai banks should reconsider the conglomerate banking group model used in Europe and the US. In the wake of the sub-prime mortgage crisis Asian and Thai banks should segregate banking functions with soundness and stability as the priority.’
The Post felt that another potential issue in Thailand might arise from the fact that, ‘Four Thai banks, Bangkok Bank, Krung Thai, Bank of Ayudhya and BankThai, have offshore investments in collateralised debt obligations (CDOs). CDOs have fallen sharply in value since last year due to market illiquidity and the collapse of the US sub-prime mortgage market. BankThai has the largest exposure to CDOs, at $310 million as of the end of last year, followed by Krung Thai bank at $160 million, Bank of Ayudhya at $85 million and Bangkok Bank at $50 million.’
However there was some evidence of a recovery as reported in The Nation, ‘The confidence index on economic outlook moved up from 72.6 points in February to 73.8, according to University of Thai Chamber of Commerce’s survey. The university’s director Thanavath Phonvichai said the confidence index has been rising for five consecutive months, signalling the recovery in confidence.’
The fact that the index remains lower than 100 indicated that consumption has yet to fully recover but the survey also suggested that negative factors affecting confidence included the high oil prices, the sub-prime crisis and the strong baht.
|